Idaho Supreme Court· 6/15/1989

State v. Bingham

Citations

776 P.2d 424
116 Idaho 415
1989 Ida. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it is not outside the understanding of the average juror to recognize the ability of a mentally retarded twelve-year-nld to correctly perceive and report events
holding that it is not outside the understanding of the average juror to recognize the ability of a mentally retarded twelve-year-old to correctly perceive and report events
holding that error in admitting expert opinion would not constitute fundamental error
holding that error in admitting expert opinion would not constitute fundamental error
determining that admission of expert testimony is not fundamental error, even where admission is abuse of discretion
overruled on other grounds by State v. Pizzuto, 119 Idaho 742, 775, 810 P.2d 680, 713 (1991)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Bakes, Bistline, Huntley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.