Skip to main content
· 2/1/2013

State v. Darin William Parton

Citations

  • 154 Idaho 558
  • 300 P.3d 1046
  • 2013 WL 427438
  • 2013 Ida. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct when the prosecutor's questioning of two officers elicited testimony that violated the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights
  • “If ... defense counsel did not realize the impropriety of the ... prosecutor’s actions, ignorance of the law is not a tactical decision.”
  • police officer testifying at trial that he arrested a criminal defendant in part because he did not respond to questions he asked
  • “If . . . defense counsel did not realize the impropriety of the . . . prosecutor’s actions, ignorance of the law is not a tactical decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.