State v. Joseph R. Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this Court does not directly review or overrule decisions from the Court of Appeals, rather, if there is a conflict, lower courts—including the Court of Appeals—are expected to follow the decisions of this Court
• “If, in an appeal to this Court, a party relies upon the reasoning in an opinion of the Court of Appeals, we may agree with or reject that reasoning, …”
• “Because the district court’s failure to sua sponte order the evaluation did not 10 violate a constitutional right, it does not constitute a fundamental error that is reviewable on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).