Court of Appeals of Arizona· 11/29/1988
State v. Byrd
Citations
- 772 P.2d 1135
- 160 Ariz. 282
- 22 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 24
- 1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that rehabilitation of the victim was proper after impeachment involving inconsistent statements of the victim had placed her truthfulness in issue
- “The impeachment of the victim by inconsistent statements put her truthfulness in issue. Blankinship v. Duarte, 137 Ariz. 217, 669 P.2d 994 (App. 1983). The rehabilitation of the victim by the state with character evidence was proper.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Livermore, Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JonasArizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 61×
- State v. BartlettArizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 43×
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-21· cited 18×
- State v. EverhartCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-06-27· cited 11×
- State of Arizona v. Jerry Charles HolleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-09-16· cited 10×
- State v. DePianoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-01-10· cited 7×
- State v. JonasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-12-22· cited 6×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- State v. NashArizona Supreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 279×
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court· 1984-09-20· cited 183×
- Rose v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1985-06-03· cited 120×
- State v. MinceyArizona Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 87×
- State v. JerousekArizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-06· cited 76×
- State v. HallArizona Supreme Court· 1978-10-18· cited 34×
- State v. GriffinArizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 26×
- State v. BishopArizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 25×
- State v. CannonArizona Supreme Court· 1988-05-03· cited 20×
- Blankinship v. DuarteCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-05-16· cited 19×
- State v. CregoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-07-23· cited 19×
- State v. SpenceCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-05-08· cited 12×
- State v. ViertelCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-09-22· cited 9×
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-02-15· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.