State v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no promise when, in addition to statement that cooperation could affect sentencing, defendant was also told there would be “no deals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Amaya-Ruiz
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
• State v. Tison
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 175×
• State v. Fulminante
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1989-07-11· cited 146×
• State v. Schad
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-13· cited 95×
• State v. Gretzler
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-04-21· cited 92×
• State v. Encinas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-06-02· cited 78×
• State v. Lopez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-12-22· cited 70×
• State v. Tucker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-06-02· cited 57×
• State v. Strayhand
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-09-07· cited 49×
• State v. Lacy
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1996-12-31· cited 43×
• State v. Finehout
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-25· cited 42×
• State v. Hensley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-06-30· cited 41×
• State v. Tapia
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1988-12-08· cited 39×
• Sanders v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-03-25· cited 28×
• State v. Ferguson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-14· cited 27×
• State v. Linden
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-02-17· cited 22×
• State of Arizona v. Heulon Colston Brown
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-09-27· cited 21×
• State of Arizona v. Angel Antonio Perez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-08-30· cited 21×
• State v. McVay
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-16· cited 14×
• State v. Thomas
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 14×