Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/21/1990
State v. Ross
Citations
- 804 P.2d 112
- 166 Ariz. 579
- 67 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 38
- 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 274
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prosecutor commits reversible error by violating plea agreement with defendant, even absent showing of actual prejudice
- where the 14-year-old defendant was sentenced to 25 years without the possibility of parole for sexual assault on a 14-year-old girl
- “essential fairness” underlies 17 JONES v. RESPECT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE Opinion of the Court system of justice
- State agreed to make no sentencing recommendation; prosecutor’s “rigorous[]” cross-examination of defense witnesses, challenge to defense assertion that defendant wavered before commission of crime “breached the ‘spirit of the inducement’ ” to plead
- fundamental fairness precludes prosecution from violating terms of plea agreement
- fundamental fairness precludes prosecution from violating terms of plea agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lankford, Jacobson, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DavisArizona Supreme Court· 2003-10-30· cited 93×
- State v. MyersWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-11-20· cited 91×
- Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-07· cited 50×
- State v. MelendezArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-16· cited 36×
- State v. ArbaughWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2004-04-07· cited 28×
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-08· cited 25×
- State v. SasakCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-11-09· cited 24×
- State v. HarveyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-07-02· cited 12×
- SHANE NOEL JONES and VICTORIA CRANFORD v. RESPECT THE WILL OF THE PEOPLECourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2022-08-25
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court· 1983-06-28· cited 4,242×
- State v. LeonArizona Supreme Court· 1969-03-14· cited 1,311×
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 1,007×
- Satterwhite v. TexasSupreme Court· 1988-05-31· cited 926×
- State v. GerlaughArizona Supreme Court· 1985-04-23· cited 71×
- State v. JonasArizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 61×
- State v. BartlettArizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-17· cited 43×
- State v. HurleyArizona Supreme Court· 1987-07-02· cited 42×
- State v. DavisArizona Supreme Court· 1972-06-16· cited 36×
- State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-06-29· cited 35×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1989-06-13· cited 34×
- State v. LimpusCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-02-19· cited 28×
- State v. GermainCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-15· cited 27×
- State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1979-10-11· cited 26×
- State v. GeorgeoffArizona Supreme Court· 1990-03-08· cited 19×
- State v. HilliardCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-07-22· cited 15×
- In Re Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-73355Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-27· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.