State v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An out-of-custody defendant has the responsibility to remain in contact with his attorney and the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Arizona v. Edward James Rose
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2013-04-04· cited 50×
• In re MH 2006-000749
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-02-13· cited 39×
• Bishop v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA CTY.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-06-24· cited 26×
• State v. Holm
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-04· cited 15×
• State v. Love
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-12-10· cited 14×
• State v. Byrd
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-11-29· cited 10×
• State v. Martinez-Gonzales
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-04-03· cited 8×
• State v. Walker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-08-12
• State of Arizona v. Steven Ricardo Vallejo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-06-18

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Pate v. Robinson
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-21· cited 3,039×
• State v. Watson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-10-18· cited 77×
• Frank Lynn Brewer v. Robert Raines
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-02-22· cited 53×
• State v. Goldsmith
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-11-19· cited 36×
• State v. Noble
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-09-20· cited 35×
• State v. Tudgay
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-09· cited 30×
• State v. Blier
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-11-29· cited 17×
• State v. Rice
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-03· cited 10×
• State v. Tramble
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-08-02· cited 5×
• State v. Bishop
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-03-27· cited 1×