State v. Bush

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, although the defendant was intoxicated, he was capable of waiving his Miranda rights given that the trial court found that the defendant “asked appropri- ate questions” and “sought clarification” when he did not understand
• considering that the defendant was under the influence of methamphetamine in determin- ing whether the defendant understood his rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Castillo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-28· cited 6×
• State v. Rodriguez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-26· cited 1×
• State v. Myers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-29· cited 1×
• State v. Vasquez-Gonzalez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-01

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Michigan v. Mosley
  Supreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
• Colorado v. Spring
  Supreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 1,070×
• State v. Vondehn
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-07-01· cited 80×
• State v. Acremant
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 55×
• State v. McAnulty
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-10-30· cited 53×
• United States v. Cecil Hsu
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-08-08· cited 49×
• Ike Easley, Jr. v. Sheldon Frey
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-01-11· cited 39×
• State v. Avila-Nava
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 28×
• State v. Holcomb
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-05-30· cited 25×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Deford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 22×
• State v. Corona
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-12-08· cited 16×
• State v. Rowe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-06-11· cited 16×
• State v. Hensley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 11×
• State v. Brummer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-08· cited 2×