Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/30/2007

State v. Holcomb

Citations

159 P.3d 1271
213 Or. App. 168
2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 744
2007 WL 1545645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “a criminal defendant’s own statements regarding the crime are especially persuasive and potentially more likely to affect the jury’s verdict than other sources of the same information”
noting that, following an unequivocal invocation of the right to remain silent or the right to counsel, “[t]he opportunity to resume interrogating the suspect varies depending on which right the suspect unequivocally invokes”
analyzing whether erroneous admission of the defendant’s statements required reversal of the defendant’s convictions, even in the absence of any party arguments regarding harmlessness
“We recognize that, in many instances, a criminal defendant’s own statements regarding the crime are especially persuasive and potentially more likely to affect the jury’s verdict than other sources of the same information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Armstrong, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.