Ike Easley, Jr. v. Sheldon Frey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that police officer's \matter-of-fact communication of the evidence against [the defendant] and the potential punishment he faced\ did not constitute interrogation
• holding that police officer's \matter-of-fact communication of the evidence against [defendant] and the potential punishment he faced\ did not constitute interrogation
• holding that informing the defendant that an eyewitness was willing to testify against him and that if convicted he could be subject to the death penalty did not constitute “interrogation”
• finding no interrogation when suspect confessed after being accurately informed that someone had implicated him in a crime, and that he could be subject to the death-penalty if convicted
• finding no interrogation when suspect confessed after being accurately informed that someone had implicated him in a crime, and that he could be subject to the death-penalty if convicted
• upholding finding that officer was not interrogating suspect where he informed him of the charges that he faced and explained that, if convicted, he could be sentenced to death

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).