Skip to main content

Coleman v. Sopher

Citations

  • 499 S.E.2d 592
  • 201 W. Va. 588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing failure to preserve alleged errors when party presented motion in limine for exclusion of evidence but record failed to establish that specific challenges raised were presented to or addressed by court below on the record
  • “[a trial] court has plenary power to reconsider, revise, alter, or amend an interlocutory order”
  • “order granting a new trial is interlocutory and destroys the finality of the judgment.”
  • \order granting a new trial is interlocutory and destroys the finality of the judgment.\
  • “Timely and specific objections are required under Rule 103(a) of the West Virginia Rules of Evidence, and Rule 46 of the West Virginia Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Maynard, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.