State v. Frischman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying supplementation of the administrative record with facts that substitute plaintiffs opinion for the agency’s determinations
• striking the protestor’s submitted declarations because “[t]hese documents proffer facts that substitute plaintiffs opinion for the [government’s] technical determinations”
• denying supplementation with a declaration and affidavit because they “proffer facts that substitute plaintiffs opinion for the [agency’s] technical determinations”
• declining to consider declarations submitted by the protestor because these “documents proffer facts that substitute plaintiffs opinion for the [agency’s] technical determinations”
• striking proposed declarations because “[t]hese documents proffer facts that substitute plaintiffs opinion for the [government’s] technical determinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).