Skip to main content

State v. Buck

Citations

  • 314 S.E.2d 406
  • 173 W. Va. 243
  • 1984 W. Va. LEXIS 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a sentencing court may consider codefendants’ respective involvement in the crime, prior records, rehabilitative potential, and lack of remorse
  • holding that a sentencing court may consider codefendants’ respective involvement in the crime, prior records, rehabilitative potential, and lack of remorse
  • holding that a sentencing court may consider codefendants’ respective involvement in the crime, prior records, rehabilitative potential, and lack of remorse
  • setting aside seventy-five year sentence for aggravated robbery because it was defendant's first crime of violence and defendant’s remorse was genuine with an offer to pay restitution
  • ordering the designation of another circuit judge for resen-tencing of a criminal defendant
  • “Disparate sentences for codefendants are not per se unconstitutional. Courts consider many factors such as each codefendant’s respective involvement in the criminal transaction (including who was the prime mover

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.