Skip to main content

State v. Garcia

Citations

  • 295 Kan. 53
  • 283 P.3d 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that these factors—commonly known as the Edgar factors from State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 [2006]— establish a sound benchmark
  • noting that these factors—commonly known as the Edgar factors from State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 [2006]—establish a sound benchmark
  • noting that these factors—commonly known as the Edgar factors from State v. Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 [2006]— establish a sound benchmark
  • noting that these considerations— commonly known as the Edgar factors—establish a sound benchmark
  • reversing district court's decision based on an erroneous understanding of the law and remanding for another hearing applying the correct legal standard
  • reversing ruling on motion to withdraw plea based on erroneous understanding of law and remanding for another hearing applying appropriate legal standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biles, Johnson, Nuss, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.