Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2/14/2008
Bellamy v. State
Citations
- 941 A.2d 1107
- 403 Md. 308
- 2008 Md. LEXIS 36
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that statements in a prosecutor's proffer from a prior case were admissible as statements made by a party opponent because: (1
- concluding that statements in a prosecutor's proffer from a prior case were admissible as statements made by a party opponent because: (1) the statements \unequivocally manifested an adoption of or belief in [the defendant's] statement\ during the plea hearing; and (2
- explaining that “what evidence to believe, what weight to be given it, and what facts flow from that evidence are for the jury ... to determine”
- holding that “a person aids and abets the commission of a crime by knowingly associating with the criminal venture with the intent to help commit the crime, being present when the crime is committed, and seeking by some act to make the crime succeed”
- speaking of “unequivocally manifesting] an adoption of or belief in” a statement of another
- “ ‘Once it has been determined that error was committed, reversal is required unless the error did not influence the verdict; the error is harmless only if it did not play any role in the jury’s verdict.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Raker, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Cathell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-07-15· cited 75×
- Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-10· cited 57×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-17· cited 56×
- State v. SealsLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2011-12-29· cited 51×
- Gordon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-20· cited 33×
- Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-08-07· cited 26×
- Washington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-12-12· cited 21×
- Pizza di Joey v. Mayor & City Cncl. of Balt.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2020-08-17· cited 20×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-01-05· cited 18×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-01-27· cited 13×
- Handy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-26· cited 12×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-02-20· cited 12×
- Simms v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 12×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-03-14· cited 11×
- Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-08· cited 11×
- Greenberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-08-17· cited 10×
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-11· cited 10×
- Belton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-05-31· cited 9×
- Henson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-31· cited 8×
- Gross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-26· cited 8×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,863×
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court· 1991-08-02· cited 932×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2001-12-03· cited 265×
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 209×
- Thompson v. Texas Mexican Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1946-04-29· cited 208×
- United States v. Michael O'keefe, Sr. Eric Schmidt John O'Brien Gary Bennett Paul SchmitzFifth Circuit· 1997-11-11· cited 206×
- United States v. Bernard McKeonSecond Circuit· 1984-06-20· cited 205×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- Dykes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-11· cited 140×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-02-11· cited 123×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-14· cited 116×
- United States v. Anthony C. Zizzo, James J. Marcello, Richard Gervasio, Anthony N. Chiaramonti, Brett K. O'dell, and Samuel A. CarlisiSeventh Circuit· 1997-07-29· cited 106×
- United States v. William Peter KampilesSeventh Circuit· 1980-01-24· cited 100×
- United States v. Michael BarileFourth Circuit· 2002-04-18· cited 100×
- United States v. George T. KattarFirst Circuit· 1988-02-22· cited 98×
- United States v. Wilbert B. WarrenD.C. Circuit· 1995-02-16· cited 92×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-08· cited 89×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.