Utah Supreme Court· 7/12/1996
State v. Arguelles
Citations
- 921 P.2d 439
- 1996 WL 392553
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that defendant demonstrate prejudice flowing from counsel’s failure to inform of right to testify
- rejecting request to presume prejudice; applying Strickland: record does not reflect what defendant's testimony would have been
- naming circumstances in which prejudice may be presumed, but refusing to presume prejudice despite the fact that defendant argued that structural error occurred
- reviewing defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim and stressing that defendant had “not proffered any record evidence which undermines our confidence in his conviction”
- requiring defendant to show that counsel’s deficient performance prejudiced the defendant
- requiring offer of proof to show what evidence would be adduced
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zimmerman, Stewart, Howe, Durham, Russon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Momon v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 2000-03-30· cited 1,008×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-05-25· cited 374×
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court· 2001-02-23· cited 89×
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1999-08-19· cited 58×
- Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court· 1999-09-10· cited 56×
- Winward v. StateUtah Supreme Court· 2012-12-07· cited 56×
- State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-09-06· cited 53×
- State v. ChaconUtah Supreme Court· 1998-06-05· cited 50×
- Turpin v. CurtisSupreme Court of Georgia· 2004-11-22· cited 39×
- State v. BedellUtah Supreme Court· 2014-01-24· cited 35×
- State v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2013-12-05· cited 24×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2022-04-07· cited 20×
- State v. SessionsUtah Supreme Court· 2014-10-21· cited 18×
- State v. MalagaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2006-03-16· cited 17×
- State v. Rasabout and KaykeoCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2013-03-21· cited 17×
- State v. SilvaCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2000-11-02· cited 16×
- State v. BennettUtah Supreme Court· 2000-02-11· cited 13×
- Lucero v. KennardUtah Supreme Court· 2005-11-15· cited 11×
- State v. TelfordCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-06-26· cited 9×
- State v. FeatherhatCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2011-05-12· cited 8×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court· 1991-04-01· cited 2,917×
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 2,329×
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,420×
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,403×
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,335×
- Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1988-08-25· cited 1,289×
- Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 1,235×
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1990-11-13· cited 1,172×
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 651×
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court· 1994-02-15· cited 508×
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-18· cited 407×
- United States v. Donald TeagueEleventh Circuit· 1992-02-26· cited 386×
- Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-01-03· cited 305×
- Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1919-11-10· cited 288×
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court· 1994-03-29· cited 259×
- People v. NaranjoSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-10-26· cited 225×
- State v. VerdeUtah Supreme Court· 1989-02-03· cited 205×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.