Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/7/1982

State v. Bridges

Citations

298 S.E.2d 212
278 S.C. 447
1982 S.C. LEXIS 463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, in general, the conduct of a criminal trial is left largely to the sound discretion of the presiding judge, and the appellate court will not interfere unless it clearly appears that rights of the complaining party were abused or prejudiced in some way
holding that, in general, \the conduct of a criminal trial is left largely to the sound discretion of the presiding judge and [the appellate court] will not interfere unless it clearly appears that rights of the complaining party were abused or prejudiced in some way\
finding testimony which was normally inadmissible because of the-“dead man’s” statute admissible because another witness testified to substantially the same matters
trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to rule on the admissibility of impeachment evidence until it was offered in the regular course of the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.