Skip to main content

People v. Rose

Citations

  • 393 N.E.2d 698
  • 75 Ill. App. 3d 45
  • 30 Ill. Dec. 662
  • 1979 Ill. App. LEXIS 3033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the circuit court was not required to rule on defendant's motion to exclude his prior convictions until defendant testified
  • the circuit court was not required to rule on defendant’s motion to exclude his prior convictions until defendant testified
  • the circuit court was not required to rule on defendant’s motion to exclude his prior convictions until defendant testified
  • “the trial court was not required to rule on the motion until defendant testified”
  • The trial court was not required to rule on the motion until defendant testified
  • The trial court was not required to rule on the motion until defendant testified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.