Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 12/4/2007
State v. Paige
Citations
- 654 S.E.2d 300
- 375 S.C. 643
- 2007 S.C. App. LEXIS 228
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no actual or inherent prejudice resulted from the trial court’s refusal to order spectators to remove buttons from their clothing
- refusal to order spectators to remove buttons with victim’s photograph not inherently prejudicial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huff, Pieper, Cureton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- Carey v. MusladinSupreme Court· 2006-12-11· cited 1,245×
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 1,122×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-06-08· cited 40×
- Shearer v. DeShonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-07-09· cited 37×
- State v. BridgesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-07· cited 29×
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-03-03· cited 20×
- State v. CarriganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-03-12· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.