United States v. David Driver

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “defense counsel could reasonably have concluded that the strength of [defendant’s] claim to innocence would have been dissipated by arguing to the jury that [defendant] was part of a conspiracy to distribute cocaine, but that he was not part of the conspiracy charged in the indictment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).