State v. HOLLINGQUEST

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• after the Court of Appeals “remanded for resentenc-ing pursuant to ORS 138.222(5)(a), the entire case was before the trial court for resentencing — that is, for imposition of new sentences”
• after the Court of Appeals “remanded for resentencing pursuant to ORS 138.222(5)(a), the entire case was before the trial court for resentencing—that is, for imposition of new sentences”
• at resentencing, “the trial court had the authority to consider any and all arguments that defendant might choose to make concerning the constitutionality of the sentence that the court was being asked to impose”
• “[W]e have held on numerous occasions that we need not address each and every assignment of error pertaining to sentencing on appeal if we conclude that one of the errors is an error that requires plenary resentencing under ORS 138.222(5).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).