Ohio Supreme Court· 9/28/2023

State v. Miller

Citations

173 Ohio St. 3d 102
227 N.E.3d 1189
2023 Ohio 3448

Syllabus

Court of appeals' judgment affirmed in absence of four votes to reverse.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Even assuming that a defendant’s motion for leave should have been granted, we will nonetheless uphold the denial of a motion for leave if the defendant’s underlying new-trial motion would be without merit.” (citing Bethel, 192 N.E.3d at 484) (Kennedy, J. concurring)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.