Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/10/2024

State v. Wilcox

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5719

Syllabus

Criminal law—Confrontation Clause of Sixth Amendment to United States Constitution—Absent witness's statements to law-enforcement officers captured on body-camera video that were given before defendant's apprehension were nontestimonial because officers were responding to an ongoing emergency—Absent witness's statements captured on body-camera video after defendant's apprehension were testimonial, and admission of those statements violated defendant's right to confrontation—Court of appeals' judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Judges: Fischer, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.