State v. Birt
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2224
Syllabus
Defendant appeals denial of his motion for leave to move for a new trial. Defendant convicted of sex offenses involving minor daughter. Defendant supported motion with affidavits indicating daughter recanted. Trial court abused discretion in denying motion. Defendant submitted affidavits demonstrating that Defendant could not have obtained the recantation evidence within 120 days of the jury verdicts. No decision on merits was rendered on the recantation issue in earlier postconviction filing and res judicata was inapplicable.
Judges: Byrne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. BirtOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-08· cited 51×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2024-01-18· cited 29×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-20· cited 23×
- State v. McKnightOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-03· cited 11×
- State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-14· cited 7×
- State v. BentleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-06· cited 4×
- State v. BostickOhio Supreme Court· 2025-12-16· cited 4×
- Settlers Walk Home Owners' Assn. v. Phoenix Settlers Walk, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-27· cited 3×
- State v. HagensOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-03· cited 3×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-16· cited 2×
- State v. BrandOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-28· cited 2×
- State v. RaineyOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-07-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.