Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/30/1992
State v. Blackman
Citations
- 617 A.2d 619
- 94 Md. App. 284
- 1992 Md. App. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Even if the frisk would have been unlawful ..., there was no right or privilege on the part of the [defendant] to resist it by using force against the officer.”
- Terry stop to investigate whether there was outstanding warrant for suspect’s arrest was proper
- “Even if the frisk would have been unlawful . . . there was no right or privilege on the part of the appellee to resist it by using - 36 - force against the officer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-08· cited 157×
- McCracken v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-11-26· cited 74×
- State v. WiegmannCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-04· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia· 2002-11-01· cited 56×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2003-06-27· cited 44×
- Belote v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-10-13· cited 36×
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-26· cited 35×
- Holt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-10-28· cited 35×
- In re Albert S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-09-08· cited 24×
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-11-25· cited 21×
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-08-06· cited 20×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-09-03· cited 18×
- Flores v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-03-03· cited 16×
- State v. ColemanNebraska Court of Appeals· 2001-07-10· cited 12×
- Monk v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-28· cited 9×
- State v. HoltCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-29· cited 7×
- Thornton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-07-25· cited 2×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-10-10· cited 6,013×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Massachusetts v. UptonSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 821×
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-02-13· cited 227×
- United States v. Raymond J. BerryhillNinth Circuit· 1971-08-03· cited 137×
- City of Columbus v. FraleyOhio Supreme Court· 1975-03-12· cited 108×
- Miller v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-12-15· cited 95×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-01· cited 93×
- Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-22· cited 91×
- Simpler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-01-11· cited 69×
- State v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1973-06-08· cited 68×
- Birchead v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-04· cited 65×
- Kellum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-06-30· cited 58×
- Barnhard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-09· cited 57×
- Malcolm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-01· cited 55×
- Derricott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-08-26· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.