Skip to main content

People v. Curtis

Citations

  • 450 P.2d 33
  • 70 Cal. 2d 347
  • 74 Cal. Rptr. 713
  • 1969 Cal. LEXIS 338

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that duty to refrain from resisting unlawful arrest does not violate Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable seizures
  • holding that duty to refrain from resisting unlawful arrest does not violate Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable seizures
  • “an officer may only use reasonable force to make an arrest or to overcome resistance” (emphasis in original)
  • \There is no constitutional impediment to the state's policy of removing controversies over the legality of an arrest from the streets to the courtroom.\
  • “There is no constitutional impediment to the state’s policy of removing controversies over the legality of an arrest from the streets to the courtroom.”
  • guilty verdict on charge of resisting arrest not conclusive as to plaintiff's claim of excessive force used by police officers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

158 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.