Arizona Supreme Court· 12/18/1980
State v. Bishop
Citations
- 622 P.2d 478
- 127 Ariz. 531
- 1980 Ariz. LEXIS 304
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- mitigating factors of no prior criminal record and low intelligence not sufficiently substantial to call for leniency in sentencing for murder committed in especially heinous, cruel or depraved manner
- mitigating factors of no prior criminal record and low intelligence not sufficiently substantial to call for leniency in sentencing for murder committed in especially heinous, cruel or depraved manner
- below average intelligence, fact that defendant completed only the sixth grade and lack of prior criminal record were not sufficiently substantial to call for leniency
- below average intelligence, fact that defendant completed only the sixth grade and lack of prior criminal record were not sufficiently substantial to call for leniency
- one aggravating circumstance and mitigating circumstances that defendant had no prior criminal record and cooperation with the police were not enough to warrant leniency
- error harmless because defendant subsequently was able to have the issue of aggravating circumstances presented and reviewed by the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holohan, Struckmeyer, Hays, Cameron, Gordon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1990-08-30· cited 1,972×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court· 1992-07-10· cited 361×
- State v. GilliesArizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
- State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-24· cited 217×
- State v. AdamsonArizona Supreme Court· 1983-04-11· cited 201×
- State v. TrostleArizona Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 187×
- State v. Soto-FongArizona Supreme Court· 1996-11-19· cited 182×
- State v. TisonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-09· cited 175×
- Donald Edward Beaty v. Terry Stewart, DirectorNinth Circuit· 2002-08-27· cited 164×
- State v. McCallArizona Supreme Court· 1983-11-09· cited 164×
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-28· cited 142×
- State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 139×
- State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-10· cited 131×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-13· cited 116×
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court· 1998-11-12· cited 114×
- State v. OrtizArizona Supreme Court· 1981-11-23· cited 110×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 109×
- State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 96×
- State v. LambrightArizona Supreme Court· 1983-09-28· cited 96×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- State v. WatsonArizona Supreme Court· 1978-07-20· cited 206×
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court· 1980-07-25· cited 189×
- State v. MataArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-11· cited 117×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 108×
- State v. CejaArizona Supreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 92×
- State v. SteelmanArizona Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 62×
- State v. MadsenArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 46×
- State v. ArnettArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-12· cited 23×
- State v. BishopArizona Supreme Court· 1978-03-01· cited 19×
- Bishop v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.