United States v. Phillip Cyprian and Leroy v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that evidence supported conviction for conspiracy to defraud 39 government where defendant personally paid employees in cash, and was responsible for filing tax forms on behalf of employees and providing them with W-2 forms
• finding that evidence supported conviction for conspiracy to defraud 39 government where defendant personally paid employees in cash, and was responsible for filing tax forms on behalf of employees and providing them with W-2 forms
• counting district court dismissal and dismissal of subsequent appeal as separate strikes
• “The language of § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) parallels the 24 language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).”
• “Congress could have written a statute making exhaustion a 24 precondition to judgment, but it did not. The actual statute makes exhaustion a precondition to 25 suit.” (citations omitted)
• “Congress could have written a statute making exhaustion a 24 precondition to judgment, but it did not. The actual statute makes exhaustion a precondition to 25 suit.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).