Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/27/2026

State v. Beardsley

Citations

2026 Ohio 1083

Syllabus

Duhart. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. The convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court, in sentencing separately for counts 1 and 2 did not err simply because the parties agreed that they should merge.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Underwood
Ohio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
State v. Damron
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-05-18· cited 83×
State v. Lewis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-09· cited 12×
State v. Brooks
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-25· cited 11×
State v. Berry
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-30· cited 8×
State v. Neiss-Parsons
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-22· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.