Skip to main content

State v. Harris

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1777

Syllabus

Affirming the sentence in this case. Consecutive sentences were supported by the law, and the proper findings were made at both the sentencing hearing and in the sentencing journal entry pursuant to R.C. 2929.14(C)(a), (b), and (c). In addition, the trial court did not err in failing to sentence Harris for the findings of guilt that merged for the purposes of sentencing. Sulek

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.