Skip to main content

State v. Williams

Citations

  • 854 P.2d 131
  • 175 Ariz. 98
  • 140 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1993 Ariz. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that § 604.01 enhancements apply only when a child is the person against whom the crime is directed
  • holding that § 604.01 enhancements apply only when a child is the person against whom the crime is directed
  • holding that statute's language is best and most reliable guide of its meaning
  • noting that when construing statutes, a court’s goal is to “fulfill the intent of the legislature that wrote it”
  • rejecting the argument “that a ‘dangerous crime against children’ can only be committed intentionally or knowingly, in contrast to recklessly”
  • noting the need to distinguish between elements of offenses that may qualify as DCAC and additional conditions for imposing sentence enhancements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martone, Feldman, Moeller, Corcoran, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.