State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasic

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Graham v. Florida does not apply to consecutive term-of- years sentences for various offenses that exceed a juvenile’s life expectancy
• holding that a combined 139.75-year sentence for a juvenile defendant who committed non-homicide offenses was constitutional
• holding that “Graham does not categorically bar the sentence[] imposed” on a juvenile offender convicted of “thirty-two felonies arising from six arsons and one attempted arson committed over a one-year period beginning when he was seventeen years of age”
• holding that Graham was limited to sentences of “life without parole”
• holding that \ Graham does not categorically bar the sentence[ ] imposed\ on a juvenile offender convicted of \thirty-two felonies arising from six arsons and one attempted arson committed over a one-year period beginning when he was seventeen years of age\
• holding Graham inapplicable to an aggregate life sentence for 32 felonies arising from six arsons and one attempted arson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).