State v. Coghill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that defendant who knowingly possessed child pornography satisfied the DCAC statute because the jury “implicitly found that his conduct focused on the children”
• when reversing conviction on one ground, court need not address other issues unlikely to recur on retrial
• error not harmless when other evidence against defendant not overwhelming and jurors could have used wrongly admitted evidence for improper purpose
• identifying other limitations on the admissibility of other-act evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).