Skip to main content

State v. Bell

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2489

Syllabus

Felony Sentencing; R.C. 2929.12; Consecutive Sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4). The record shows the trial court considered the statutory factors set forth in R.C. 2929.12 in sentencing defendant-appellant. However, the trial court did not verbally state all of the findings mandated by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) at the sentencing hearing concerning consecutive sentencing, so the consecutive sentences with respect to the prison terms for two of the offenses are vacated and the case is remanded for the limited purpose of resentencing defendant-appellant only with respect to the issue of whether those two sentences should be served consecutively. Defendant-appellant's convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.