State v. Johnson

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 1768

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is no clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentences are not supported by the record or otherwise contrary to law. Furthermore, because the trial court made the findings required by R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences and those findings are supported by the record, defendant-appellant's consecutive sentences are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.