Skip to main content

State v. Tolbert

Citations

  • 209 N.E.3d 170
  • 2023 Ohio 532

Syllabus

Resentencing limited remand R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) felony sentence R.C. 2929.14(C) consecutive sentences statutory findings clearly and convincingly supported by the record sentencing range separate sentence for each offense improper purpose sentencing-package doctrine. The trial court properly conducted resentencing within the narrow context of determining whether to impose consecutive sentences and making findings related thereto. Further, the trial court did not impose sentences under a sentencing package. Finally, arguments regarding the sentences that were not raised in the first appeal are therefore barred by res judicata.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.