Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 3/14/2000

State v. Arnett

Citations

  • 2000 Ohio 302
  • 88 Ohio St. 3d 208

Syllabus

Criminal law—When sentencing judge acknowledges consulting a religious text during deliberations and quotes a portion of that text on the record in the sentencing proceeding, such conduct is not per se impermissible and does not violate the offender's right to due process, when.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the trial judge's reference to a particular verse of the Bible in sentencing a defendant for rape of a minor did not violate the sentencing laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.