Court of Appeals of Utah· 8/13/1993
State v. Beavers
Citations
- 859 P.2d 9
- 219 Utah Adv. Rep. 36
- 1993 Utah App. LEXIS 139
- 1993 WL 316186
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that exigent circumstances exist when officers reasonably believe immediate entry is required “to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons” (internal quotation omitted)
- observing that exigent circumstances exist when officers reasonably believe immediate entry is required \to prevent physical harm to the officers or other persons\ (internal quotation omitted)
- “The existence of exigent circumstances must be based on the reasonable belief of the police officer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Billings, Garff, Orme
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brigham City v. StuartUtah Supreme Court· 2005-02-18· cited 47×
- State v. ComerCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-06-27· cited 33×
- Hopkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1994-12-29· cited 31×
- City of Orem v. HenrieCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-02-04· cited 28×
- State v. YoderCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1997-03-20· cited 22×
- State v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-05-23· cited 16×
- Brigham City v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2002-10-03· cited 14×
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1996-11-21· cited 12×
- State v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1994-11-01· cited 11×
- State v. DuranCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-09-29· cited 10×
- State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2009-12-24· cited 8×
- State v. KellyIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-08-17· cited 6×
- State v. CallahanCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2004-05-13· cited 6×
- State v. LalaLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2008-12-03· cited 5×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2025-10-30
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court· 1990-03-05· cited 2,122×
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 1,874×
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyNinth Circuit· 1984-02-10· cited 1,819×
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court· 1972-06-19· cited 1,683×
- Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court· 1987-03-03· cited 1,525×
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 1,382×
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 1,275×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 1983-06-29· cited 279×
- United States v. Ronald Tobin, Clifford Roger Ackerson, United States of America v. Ronald TobinEleventh Circuit· 1991-02-21· cited 265×
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 251×
- United States v. Joseph Pace, Anthony Besase, Christ Savides, Donald Smith, John Cialoni, and Robert WilsonSeventh Circuit· 1990-03-15· cited 206×
- Spillone v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-10-01· cited 122×
- United States v. Marvin Joseph LindseyNinth Circuit· 1989-06-09· cited 117×
- State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 112×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.