Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 2/18/2005

Brigham City v. Stuart

Citations

  • 2005 UT 13
  • 122 P.3d 506
  • 519 Utah Adv. Rep. 17
  • 2005 Utah LEXIS 23
  • 2005 WL 387966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • search under the \emergency aid doctrine\ may not be \primarily motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • search under the “emergency aid doctrine” may not be “primarily motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • rev’d and remanded sub nom Brigham City, Utah v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DURRANT's, Durham, Durrant, NEHRING's, Nehring, P46, Parrish, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.