State v. Cid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the broadest reading of the indictment’s “separate act and transaction” language was dispositive in supporting a conclusion that the defendant had pleaded guilty or no con- test to separate counts that did not merge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rich
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-29· cited 1×
• State v. Cid
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• Sherertz v. Brownstein Rask
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-09· cited 37×
• Marteeny v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-08-10· cited 17×
• State v. Barton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-03· cited 12×
• Hibbard v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-10-09· cited 8×
• State v. Cid
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-20· cited 7×
• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-20· cited 7×
• State v. Pike
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-03· cited 6×
• State v. Acker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-07-05· cited 5×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-10-05· cited 5×
• State v. Ostrom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-07-10· cited 4×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-03· cited 3×