State v. Forbes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• as condition of probation, restitution to county department of public safety that supplied undercover detective with money to spend at illegal gambling establishment permissible
• as condition of probation, restitution to county department of public safety that supplied undercover detective with money to spend at illegal gambling establishment permissible
• restitution to state agency for gambling losses of undercover detective

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Davison
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
• State v. Haddock
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-07-13· cited 83×
• State v. Townsend
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-01-04· cited 77×
• State v. Vinyard
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-03-29· cited 41×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-08-30· cited 27×
• State v. Raleigh
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-01-08· cited 16×
• State v. Ewing
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-09-05· cited 14×
• State v. Murphy
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-06-09· cited 11×
• State v. Halsen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-12-21· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Eilts
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-10-09· cited 70×
• State v. Mark
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-11· cited 63×
• State v. Barr
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 44×
• State v. Fateley
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-07-18· cited 31×
• State v. Theroff
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-26· cited 17×