State v. Barr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the same was error
• reversible error to include per diem fees in judgment when those fees were not addressed at the sentencing hearing
• reversible error to include per diem fees in judgment when those fees were not addressed at the sentencing hearing
• “The trial court erred by including a previously unannounced term in the sentencing judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Schay-Vivero
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-12· cited 11×
• State v. Martinez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19· cited 10×
• State v. Debruyne
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Avendano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-24· cited 3×
• State v. Cobat
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-21· cited 2×
• State v. Harmon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 2×
• State v. Frost
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-29· cited 1×
• State v. Alcon-Ayala
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-12-10· cited 1×
• State v. Weber
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-06-10· cited 1×
• State v. Barr
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28
• State v. Hostman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-24

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Wyatt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-01· cited 659×
• State v. Vanornum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-27· cited 546×
• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-09-09· cited 277×
• State v. Priester
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-26· cited 107×
• State v. Macy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-06-09· cited 18×
• Dept. of Human Services v. J. A.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-03-08· cited 4×