Oregon Supreme Court· 2/7/2002

State v. Barnum

Citations

39 P.3d 178
333 Or. 297
2002 Ore. LEXIS 74

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

agreeing with expert testimony that sending accusatory letters casting suspicion on other people both before and after the commission of a crime was distinctive enough to constitute a signature crime
noting that, in that case, time lapse and geographic distance between the two crimes were “of little importance” because those fac- tors only tended to prove that the other-acts crime was com- mitted by the defendant, and in that case the defendant had been convicted of the other crime
when scope of review is for errors of law, the reviewing court decides whether trial court applied legal principles correctly to facts
applying principle to multiple burglary convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, and Riggs, Justices

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.