State v. Barnum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, based on expert testimony, that sending accusatory letters casting suspicion on the victims of the crime both before and after the commission of the crime was distinctive enough to constitute a signature crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. White
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-11-09· cited 66×
• State v. Barnum
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2002-02-07· cited 35×
• State v. Dunn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-12· cited 21×
• State v. Leach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-08-30· cited 19×
• State v. Lucio-Camargo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-07· cited 15×
• State v. Baughman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-05· cited 12×
• State v. Arnold
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 3×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-01· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Brown
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
• State v. Johns
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
• State v. Pinnell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 116×
• State v. Johnson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 73×
• State v. Allison
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-08-28· cited 44×
• State v. Barnum
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-08-23· cited 16×
• State v. Sparks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-10-01· cited 13×