Cole v. Sunnyside Marketplace, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s “argument reduce[d] to the assertion that plaintiff could have asked for the information earlier than she did. That, however, is not sufficient to trigger the statute of limitations”
• explaining that, in Berry, “the Court concluded that ORS 12.110(1) does include a discovery provision that applies to actions other than those based on fraud or deceit” (emphasis in original)
• “[W]hether facts are ‘inherently discoverable’ pertains to ‘whether the plaintiff in a negligence action has exercised due diligence to discover the requisite facts.’”
• examining the history of the “discovery rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).