Skip to main content

State v. Mason

Citations

  • 250 P.3d 976
  • 241 Or. App. 714
  • 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 418

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “the phrase ‘merged for sentencing purposes’ is a misnomer and should never be used because it improperly conflates two distinct parts of the criminal process”
  • stating that “the phrase ‘merged for sentencing purposes’ is a misnomer,” which “improperly conflates two distinct parts of the criminal process: the entry of convictions and the imposition of sentences”
  • clarifying that the phrase “merged for sentencing purposes” is a “misnomer”
  • violation of separate provisions of a release agreement during a single course of conduct should merge into a single contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Lipscomb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.