State v. Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Oregon case law has long recognized that lay opinion is admissible to prove the inverse—that a person is intoxicated
• exclusion of testimony offered in part to impeach key witness’s credibility was not harmless when it “could have been helpful to the jury”
• expert testimony not required to establish that a person was under the influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Brannan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-04-17· cited 11×
• State v. Richards
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-29· cited 6×
• State v. Banks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-03-16· cited 4×
• State v. Huerta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-12-04
• State v. Boedigheimer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-02-19

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Rogers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
• State v. Lerch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-08· cited 87×
• State v. Affeld
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 78×
• State v. Clark
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 63×
• State v. Stevens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 60×
• State v. Cunningham
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-10-21· cited 56×
• State v. Hale
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 48×
• State v. Wright
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-24· cited 24×