State v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• lay testimony of past episodes of defendant’s memory loss was not “scientific evidence” and should have been admitted, warranting reversal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Deanda
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-02-28· cited 4×
• State v. Huerta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-12-04
• Joseph Earl Bland a/k/a Joseph Bland a/k/a Joseph E. Bland v. State of Mississippi
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2022-12-08

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Tucker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 91×
• State v. Lerch
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1984-02-08· cited 87×
• Mitchell v. Pennsylvania
  Supreme Court· 2007-01-16· cited 65×
• State v. Clark
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 63×
• State v. Henley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-07-19· cited 43×
• State v. Tiner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 35×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-22· cited 17×
• State v. Evensen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-06-26· cited 13×
• State v. Barnes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-11· cited 5×
• Brenner v. Nooth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 5×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-10-20· cited 4×