Skip to main content

State v. Wright

Citations

  • 843 P.2d 436
  • 315 Or. 124
  • 1992 Ore. LEXIS 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that rules of evidence do not apply to suppression hearings
  • considering federal decisions construing the identical federal rule in determining the meaning of OEC 104
  • “ ‘[p]eople often speak in the shorthand of opinions or conclusions, not in the form of a recitation of pure fact’ ”
  • ‘[p]eople often speak in the shorthand of opinions or conclusions, not in the form of a recitation of pure fact’
  • footnote referencing federal case law reaching the same conclusion under the similar federal rule omitted
  • police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a defendant when he observed that the defendant was “visibly intoxicated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Unis, Van Hoom-Issen, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.