Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/28/1983
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 329 N.W.2d 66
- 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1029
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- particular amenability to probation justifies downward dispositional departure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-07· cited 127×
- State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-09-21· cited 22×
- State v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-06-26· cited 15×
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-02-01· cited 14×
- Bixby v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-17· cited 9×
- In Re the Welfare of D.S.F.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-12-15· cited 9×
- State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-11-13· cited 5×
- State v. AndrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-05-15· cited 4×
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-07-26· cited 4×
- State v. NeslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-11-19· cited 2×
- State v. JudeSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-03-31
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-02-13· cited 171×
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
- State v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-03-26· cited 28×
- State v. ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-05-13· cited 27×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-09-30· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.